By: Ali Vyacheslav Polosin

Source : IslamDag.info | 23 Jul 2011

Muammar Gaddafi’s military success in Libya against the combined forces of NATO and the rebels' outright inefficiency suggest that the scriptwriters and stage directors of the rebellion are somewhere outside the country, and there are rather few ‘ardent revolutionaries’ and executives in Libya. The riot, co-ordinated via the Internet, has not developed into a revolution – either in a color one, or in any other in this country.

This brings about another question: whether the same scriptwriters and stage directors worked in Tunisia, Egypt, where local rebels happened to be stronger and managed to make a revolution? And are they working in Syria and Yemen now? Indeed, the scenario is quite the same, and the staging is very similar. So where are the scriptwriters and directors, and who ordered this? – To answer these questions, we need to examine the problem in the context of world politics.

It's all about the oil

Despite the importance of religion as a powerful factor of public safety or, vice versa, changes in society, yet in most cases the driving motive behind most historic events was the struggle for resources. In our era it is the struggle for the energy resources. According to the 2004 report of the inter-fractional parliamentary group ‘Russia – Islamic World: Strategic Dialogue’, “the era of cheap non-renewable natural resources, primarily energy, is over on our planet. The current global economic system was built exactly on cheap oil.

Many experts speak about the coming period of “expensive and super-expensive oil”. Its price in the forthcoming global system crisis will be determined not only by economic, but also by political and geopolitical factors. Therefore, a new round of struggle for the control of the world's energy resources has already begun, and this fierce battle will only gain momentum, including resort to warfare.”

Libya has 3% of the world oil reserves. To gain control over these resources, the oligarchs may name any person a dictator and bomb the country day and night.

The Rothschilds

Now let's see what the Western press writes about the major figures in these events. Mass media always have a lot of various information leaks about the higher power echelons.

According to a foreign press review [1], the PuppetWorld web resource published that the North African events were staged by the Rothschilds’ – a well-known financial clan, head-quartered in London, supported by European elites and competing with Chase Manhattan Bank, New York. Their competition has actually provoked many major events in the world.

The heart of the Rothschild clan is the B'nai B'rith Order (Sons of the Covenant). It represents the All Seeing Eye of Zion. The network resides mostly in London and Hong Kong. The place of oath is the Wailing Wall in Jerusalem.

Their Aim is Islamic Banking

The colour revolutions staged by the Rothschilds with the support from the Soros foundations are geared by the desire to destroy their potential competitors – Islamic banks. With the Western banking system crunch, loss of confidence in lending banks, the Islamic banks have got added impetus to the development and growth. They are much more stable than Western banks.

Thanks to the participation of Muslim banks in the risks of their clients, when the latter become in fact their companions, business associates, they are actually able to win over a great number of clients, primarily in Europe, where the Muslim population is increasing. This opinion has widely spread in the world media.

“Despite the unfavorable present-day climate, the potential of Islamic banking in Egypt is enormous, and we wait for new actions of Islamic Bank of Abu-Dhabi in Egypt, with possible takeovers,” wrote the Executive.

The latest report by Business Intelligence across the Middle East was the clearest of all: “If the Islamic Bank of Abu Dhabi manages an intervention of services for Muslims, it will gain the entire market. We already saw, how some local banks start to advance their Islamic products in the context of forthcoming fight for consumers, which, as they believe, is just about to begin.”

The New York Times article “Islamic Banking Rises on Oil Wealth, Drawing Non-Muslims” published in November, 2009, reported, “Rising oil wealth is lifting Islamic banking – banking that adheres to the laws of the Koran and its prohibition against charging interest. In addition to Islamic loans, there are Islamic bonds and Islamic credit cards. Loans and bonds that conform to the Koran are already available in the United States.”

“This industry has become truly global,” said Khawaja Mohammad Salman Younis, the managing director for operations in Malaysia for Kuwait Finance House, the world’s second-largest Islamic bank.  “In the next three to five years you’ll see Islamic banks coming out in Australia, China, Japan and other parts of the world.”

Thus, the biggest European banking houses, and the Rothschilds in the first place, were faced with the threat of losing their profits. All the more so after May 2010, when El Materi, deposed Tunisian President Ben Ali’s son-in-law, opened Tunisia’s first Islamic bank, Zitouna Bank. The bank was a first step toward Ben Ali’s new program of extensive reforms, “Tunisia, a Pole for Banking Services and a Regional Financial Centre”.

All this, according to the article in PuppetWorld, would have undermined the power and the profits of the Central Bank of Tunisia, owned by the Rothschilds and their associates. The backlash was immediate, and this fact is significant to our analysis: on January 20, 2011, the day after 33 members of Ben Ali’s clan had been arrested for “crimes against the nation”, the first Islamic Zituna Bank was absorbed by the Central Bank of Tunisia, controlled by the Rothschilds.

Economic Serfdom

According to PuppetWorld, the current Arab ‘revolutions’ are done under the pretense of bringing democracy and deposing despots, but the real aim is to initially create chaos and a leadership vacuum, then quickly offer a solution: install a puppet manipulated by the Rothschilds. “The Rothschilds want Muslims to trade their present political oppression by brutal dictators for economic serfdom under the control of banker Lord Rothschild… The citizens gain freedom of speech and association, but become economic serfs”, underlines the article.

All these ‘revolutions’, according to the article, were most likely coordinated at the highest levels by the Rothschild’s International Crisis Group. Mohamed ElBaradei, already touted as a new leader for Egypt, is a trustee of the International Crisis Group. Another board member of this group is notorious Zbigniew Brzezinski. One more prominent gentleman – George Soros – sits on the Executive Committee.  

Colour Revolutions

Arab ‘revolutions’ follow the same scheme as the fairly nonviolent ‘color revolutions’. These revolutions have been successful in case of Georgia’s Rose Revolution (2003), in Ukraine’s Orange Revolution (2004), in Lebanon’s Cedar Revolution, in Kyrgyzstan’s Tulip Revolution (March of 2005), and Tunisia’s Jasmine Revolution.  Iran’s Green Revolution (2009) was unsuccessful.

And the very first of these revolutions was the overthrow of Serbian president Slobodan Milosevic by Otpor youth movement. Activists from Otpor claimed that they had been instructed by the US based Albert Einstein Institution staff. The Albert Einstein Institution is in its turn funded by the Soros Foundation and The National Endowment for Democracy. Notably, the article says that several protest organizers on the streets in Egypt were wearing Otpor t-shirts.

In 2007-08, Freedom House, a Soros-funded organization, ran New Generation of Advocates program. The MEPI-funded program was designed support young civil society activists working for peaceful political change in the Middle East and North Africa. In Tunisia the campaign was spearheaded by Lawyers against Corruption. As the Freedom House website says, the group of “journalists, lawyers, and other activists who advocate for democratic reform” had a meeting with then Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, on a trip to Washington on International Human Rights Day, December 10, 2008.

In May 2009 the group of dissident activists met the new Secretary of State – Hillary Clinton. Freedom House reported on their website that the group also visited the “U.S. government officials, members of Congress, media outlets and think tanks… After returning to Egypt, the fellows received small grants to implement innovative initiatives such as advocating for political reform through Facebook and SMS messaging.” In 2010, Soros’ Open Society Institute funded a grant called “Can It Tweet its way to Democracy? The promise of Participatory Media in Africa”. Remember, Facebook and Twitter were the primary means of organizing the revolution in Egypt.

Thus, we obtain the following picture: the National Endowment for Democracy and George Soros invested millions of dollars into the training of North African teachers, lawyers, journalists and youth activists.  In 2009, a year before the current turmoil, they more than doubled their training efforts. [2]

In fact, these young people in exchange for grants and career prospects were told to sit in their home countries and wait for the D-day. When the time came, Soros ordered: fellows, hit the streets and take over the power. So they did and have already taken the power in two countries. There they will form the basis of the new administration, being de facto Rothschild agents.

Why weren’t they driven away by the police and the army? The situation is clear here as well: the entire leadership of the army and the police constantly travel to the Western countries to purchase arms and train to use these weapons. With the terrible corruption and low legal income in their countries, the officers of the army and the police were simply bought over and were also ordered to wait for the D-day. And when it came, they were ordered to support the protesters and rebels. That’s what they did in Tunisia and Egypt.

Yet Libya turned out a blunder: there weren’t enough pro-Western intellectuals, and most officers remained loyal to the head of the Jamahiriya. There was no other choice, but to help them with bombs and missiles. The most zealous helper was Europe (the Rothschilds’ headquarters are in London). Americans were clearly caught off guard by all these events: Mubarak was a reliable ally of the United States and Israel, Barack Obama is not a protégé of the Rockefellers with their Chase Manhattan Bank, trying to somehow reconcile them with the Rothschilds. Therefore he did not take a tough stance promoting their interests and acts hesitantly and inconsistently (This explains the U.S. discontent with Obama’s policy).

Such is the new stage of continuing rivalry for energy between two powerful clans: European (committed to the ideas of globalization and the euro) and American (committed to American global hegemony and the dollar). The Rothschilds staged the banking crisis, which didn’t affect themselves much, out of spite against the Rockefellers. They made the next move in this big game called geopolitics.

What about Muslims?

So what about Muslims? The ruling regimes in the mentioned countries really long outlived themselves, became overtly anti-popular and certainly weren’t Muslim. Without this outside “help” the population neither tried, nor had any chance to get rid of their tyrants. Almighty Allah arranges it so wisely, that enemies often fight each other, and a third party has a chance to remain a winner.

The Chinese have long observed and elevated to the rank of their foreign policy the principle: “When two people fight, I sit on the hill and watch”. We, Muslims, should learn this wisdom. Today a strong international clan ousted the other, and provided an opportunity for Muslims in several Arab countries to improve their life in these countries. We have to become reasonable and learn art of ‘sabr’ (focused patience), study social sciences and occupy the niches we can without damage to the job itself and to the image of our religion.

Today we can witness the struggle between the giants in the Islamic countries. The only exception is Turkey, where one team managed to combine Islam, professionalism, civility and respect for human rights and freedoms.

The sooner we change and re-educate ourselves, raise our educational level, become professionals in all spheres of modern life, combining it with humanity and concern for each person and each citizen, the sooner the law will work, revealed to us by Almighty Allah: “Allah will not change your situation until you change yourself (your nafs)” (the meaning of Ayah 11 Surah 13 of the Holy Qur'an).

[1] M.Vasiliev ‘Are Tunis and Egypt Revolutions Rothschilds’ Product?’ http://news.km.ru/revolyutsii-v-tunise-i-egipte-delo-ruk-rotshildov
[2]. Conventional secret date set for the beginning of a planned attack in the military.

[Copyright 2011 - IslamDag.info - All rights reserved]